Dantev2 » 13 Aug 2018 10:36 pm » wrote:
Are the tides turning in favor of LMNOP?
http://www.people-press.org/2012/02/07/ ... 16-12-c-1/
Substitute "gay marriage" with LMNOP and notify me when the numbers reach such a critical mass.
Oppose them as you like, but it's not something I would even think of losing any sleep over. In fact, it hardly registers in my subconscious.
Yes, and as I pointed out, it's a good thing since we won't have a bunch of "useless eaters" (not my term, I believe this is how the ruling class views the vast majority of people) lined up to be cogs in the capitalist machine. My support for gay marriage/gay rights is purely pragmatic; it has nothing to do with whether or not I prefer traditional over non-traditional marriage.
Those are indeed facts, and from those facts, you infer:
3. At some point, the LMNOP movement will successfully strike down laws against pedophilia.
I do not think this to be the case, and like I said, there are no polls I am aware of suggesting otherwise. In order for ANY movement to succeed, it must gain traction, or die.
I do not believe it will gain any traction.
Obama was wrong, and so are those (worthless) parents, and this has already sparked a backlash.
He still mainstreamed it, made it legal to chemically castrate boys - and I am an energized part of that backlash. Can't have a backlash without participants, so, say hi to a backlash participant.
The matter was decided by the courts, as abortion was - not by voters, who said no overwhelmingly - even in california.
Dantev2 » 13 Aug 2018 10:36 pm » wrote:
The first is that the unity of social libertarians and liberals overwhelmed social conservatives, who eventually caved. The second is that corporations love virtue signalling as a way to boost profits (Target and Starbucks seem to have this "science" down to a T), and once they realized how much money they could make painting rainbows over their advertisements, they fully backed gay marriage.
For the LMNOPs, there is hardly a "united front" pushing for this initiative; there are fringe elements who have completely lost their minds, but nobody cares about them anyway.
I don't see how corporate America stands to benefit, so I doubt they'll support any of this.
Go ask any liberal or libertarian, and I bet 99/100 will say, "No, I don't support pedophilia or allowing 40 year olds make sex with 16 yr olds. What kind of silly question is that anyway?" followed with a scowl.
Finally, I want to point out that "gay marriage" is a misnomer, because the US already allowed same sex unions/cohabitation. It was really just a ploy to gain tax benefits by redefining the term "marriage," and a cynical one at that.
It's not ONLY how far they've come - it's also the rate of success that we have to be concerned about. We need to retard the pervert movement, in order to stop it where it is.
Everything - people, businesses, ideas - is always growing or shrinking, thriving or dying. Officially sanctioned sexual perversion is an idea whose time to die has come. As soon as we gave them "two consenting adults," they started going for one consenting adult and a rape victim. They're now comfortable talking about it publicly, and they demand the right to talk to KIDS about it in school - and their demands are being met. First graders are being taught about dick suckers and bull dykes, and being instructed to "celebrate" the "diversity" of ***.
They've come too far already - they need to be slapped down hard. And your assurance that not very many people hold the parents of child castration victims in high esteem doesn't prevent those victims' impending suicides. Our culture has become an AIDS garden watered by a suicide fountain.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?