Liberal Forum

Misty » 17 Sep 2018 4:27 pm » wrote:

Termin8tor » 17 Sep 2018 4:04 pm » wrote:No, why would he?

He followed Democrats' refusal to seat Bush's nominees near the end of his presidency, almost all of them excellent.ult.

Which SCOTUS seat did the Democrats leave open for 400 days, and which Bush SCOTUS nominee did they refuse to even meet with?

Should I hold my breath for that answer?

400 days? WTF are you babbling about now? He was nominated in March.

If Hillary had won, Repubs were perfectly willing to block her nominees for four years.

Just like they blocked Sotomayer, psychopath?

Oh, wait. She was confirmed 68 to 31, and no one filibustered her.

I guess you forgot how they blocked all of Obama's judicial nominees, which is why Harry Reid was forced to change the rules.
Now they are stacking the courts with far right partisan judges.

Your party has been smearing and lying about excellent nominees going back to Bork and Clarence Thomas, and delaying in worse and worse fashion.

You and your party don't give a rat's *** about most of the Constitution or precedent or decency. It's all about raw power.

So tough **** when Kavanaugh is rammed down your throats.

Repubs went by the book.