19 Sep 2018 3:06 pm
I sourced all of that. It's almost all common knowledge, if you weren't so busy trying to smear a man of excellent character, like the Democrat Talking Point Liar that you are.Misty » 19 Sep 2018 2:51 pm » wrote:You expect me to take your word for any of that?Termin8tor » 19 Sep 2018 2:27 pm » wrote:Can you explain why she told her therapist that four men were involved, but now says there were two?
Why she never mentioned Kavanaugh's name in that session?
Why she can't remember what house it happened in?
Why she can't remember what year it occurred in?
Why she hired a leftist lawyer who worked to discredit Clinton's victims? Very, very strange behavior of someone who suffered a sexual assault.
Because 1) polygraphs aren't reliable and so aren't admissible in court, and because good operators can rig results.Isn't it ironic that the woman you are accusing of lying is the one who took a polygraph and the one calling for the FBI to investigate?
If she were lying why would she do that?
Because the silly FBI red herring fits into the corrupt Democrat Playbook to delay the vote until maybe Dems take the Senate.
She's a cog in a very corrupt machine.
If she really meant to remain anonymous as she claimed, why did she wipe her social media pages clean some time back and take that polygraph back in August?
What was she hiding?