Liberal Forum

Is it just me or is that totally non-responsive to my post?It's you. Providing competition would allow lots of choice, so if some idiot insurance company wouldn't insure needed treatments, people could easily change companies.I'd also change the tax deductibility from company to individual, so it'd be very easy to change without having to lobby one's boss.I mean, what kind of idiots would go into the health insurance business, if their religious beliefs were so unpopular that most consumers would reject them?So this is your response to my asking about Roy Blunt's Amendment?Let the free market handle it?People can't always 'easily' change insurance companies.Not all jobs offer that kind of choice.The bill also allows employers to not provide coverage for treatments or medications that they find morally objectionable. You don't think that's a very vague term and has the potential to be abused by some employers to save money? Seriously?You really ought to take the time to read Free Market publications like the WSJ. Might disturb you for a little while, but they're dangerously persuasive.The operative word being 'dangerously'.