Liberal Forum

Termin8tor » 07 Oct 2018 10:14 pm » wrote:
No, I don't see any lies, and if some liberal judge of high character made some minor mis-statement about a microscopic issue, I'd cut them slack.

Sorry to disappoint you.

Liar.

If it was a liberal judge, your team would not call it minor - the other team would.

Your team would not call it microscopic - the other team would.

Your team would not pretend they couldn't see the lies - the other team would.

Kavanaugh lied. He lied at the very least about the definition of various terms in his high school year book that he should never have been asked about, and frankly should have flatly refused to address. The stupid republicans failed to protect him, and he failed to speak the truth without flinching, as we expect judges to do, even when it is not comfortable.

Your team would blow those same lies out of all proportion, did they come from the other side, and consider those perjuries macroscopic, character revealing, disqualifying. And your team would be correct.

I'm just calling perjury perjury, while you simper about what the definition of microscopic is - while you misuse language to insinuate that some perjuries are justified.

He prefered to lie, rather than let go of the preposterous choir boy narrative he peddles about his entitled youth. And even though he should never have been put in that position, once in it, he showed his true character: perjurer.

We should demand better of a SCOTUS nominee, instead of playing team. Trump has a fat roster of judges - Kavanaugh should have been disqualified, for reasons of poor character.