A Giggles Thread: Jokes, Cartoons, Parody, Satire, Sarcasm & Irony Post #26842 • Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 07 Oct 2018 11:02 pm » wrote:
Termin8tor » 07 Oct 2018 10:14 pm » wrote:No, I don't see any lies, and if some liberal judge of high character made some minor mis-statement about a microscopic issue, I'd cut them slack.

Sorry to disappoint you.

Liar.

If it was a liberal judge, your team would not call it minor - the other team would.

Your team would not call it microscopic - the other team would.

Your team would not pretend they couldn't see the lies - the other team would.

**** off, psycho. Sotomayor lied in her hearing about how she views the 2nd Amendment. Have I called for her indictment? For her impeachment?

Have Repubs?

Kavanaugh lied. He lied at the very least about the definition of various terms in his high school year book that he should never have been asked about, and frankly should have flatly refused to address. The stupid republicans failed to protect him, and he failed to speak the truth without flinching, as we expect judges to do, even when it is not comfortable.

Your team would blow those same lies out of all proportion, did they come from the other side, and consider those perjuries macroscopic, character revealing, disqualifying. And your team would be correct.

I'm just calling perjury perjury, while you simper about what the definition of microscopic is - while you misuse language to insinuate that some perjuries are justified.

Seven witnesses testified that he was correct about that slang.

Try to keep up. $:\$