1 Mar 2019 8:19 pm
Looky here Clem, 'Liberal' attorney Alan Dershowitz whose opinion on campaign finance violations you love to trot out, may have been a little more involved with Epstein than you know.Termin8tor » 26 Jan 2018 6:11 pm » wrote:Oh, so because Epstein was engaging in immoral conduct, Dershowitz's learned opinion must be rejected?Misty » 26 Jan 2018 2:08 pm » wrote:You mean 'Liberal' attorney Alan Dershowitz who hung out with Trump and Jeffrey Epstein back in the day when Epstein was schtupping underage girls?
The possible involvement of his influential friends?A court hearing on whether to unseal sensitive documents involving the alleged sex trafficking of underage girls by Palm Beach multimillionaire Jeffrey Epstein — and the possible involvement of his influential friends — will play out in a New York City courtroom next week.
But it may happen behind closed doors, with the news media and public barred — at least in part.
An attorney for lawyer Alan Dershowitz wrote a letter to the U.S. District Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on Tuesday, asking whether the media should be excluded from the proceeding because his oral arguments on behalf of his client could contain sensitive information that has been under seal.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/ ... 22729.html
Like Dershowitz?
So Dershowitz's lawyer will be arguing not to unseal documents in the Epstein case because it may reveal sensitive information about his client?
That's interesting.