User avatar
Nobody
2 Mar 2019 11:30 am
2 Mar 2019 11:30 am
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 02 Mar 2019 7:54 am » wrote:
Misty » 01 Mar 2019 8:19 pm » wrote:
Termin8tor » 26 Jan 2018 6:11 pm » wrote:Oh, so because Epstein was engaging in immoral conduct, Dershowitz's learned opinion must be rejected?
That's as **** stupid as saying that because Epstein likes ice cream, Dershowitz's opinion is invalid.
They're totally, absolutely unrelated. :rofl: :rofl: :
Looky here Clem, 'Liberal' attorney Alan Dershowitz whose opinion on campaign finance violations you love to trot out, may have been a little more involved with Epstein than you know.
You don't like Dershowitz's opinion about Trump's non-crime, so you attack him personally on the basis of "maybe."
Dershowitz hung out with Epstein and represented him at trial and is now fighting to keep the press and the public out of a hearing on whether the records should be unsealed.

Jeffrey Epstein just settled a civil case with a woman who claims that Alan Dershowitz was among the people she was forced to have sex with.

Two women, one of whom was underage, have said that Epstein and his partner Ghislaine Maxwell directed them to have sex with Dershowitz and other wealthy powerful men.

Dershowitz is up to his eyeballs in this case.
Updated 4 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search