11 May 2019 1:09 pm
That's right.Termin8tor » 11 May 2019 12:49 pm » wrote:Well gosh, who should we believe, a psychopathic liar or every credible source I've cited?Misty » 11 May 2019 12:37 pm » wrote:This is the last time I will respond to that **** lie.
Nadler is NOT asking Barr to illegally release grand jury material without first obtaining a court order.
Only your wingnut sources are credible.
I never asked you to believe me.
I asked you to believe an actual amendment adopted by the House Judiciary Committee that says that Barr is NOT REQUIRED to release any material, including 6 (e) grand jury material in violation of federal law.
https://judiciary.house.gov/legislation ... -william-p
Are you saying that no such amendment was agreed to by Nadler's committee?
You're calling an amendement proposed by Matt Gaetz and agreed to by the Judiciary Committee 'disingenuous fine print from Nadler?'Termin8tor » 11 May 2019 12:49 pm » wrote:And no, the disingenuous fine print from that hack Nadler doesn't count for squat.
I'm done with this ****.
Arguing with someone as fact averse as you is as productive as repeatedly bashing one's head into a brick wall, and even less fun.
You can keep spreading your lies and propaganda Mr. Goebbels, but I will no longer respond.