17 Mar 2012 1:27 pm
Translated into honest English; I've written something you're too cowardly to deal with.Some "Head Ball Breaker."You cower in terror from reality.Clem is confusing cowardice with revulsion.Bulls***. Every conservative on the board knows you refuse to answer questions, as you have from the first few times I approached you."Head Ball Breaker." What a complete joke.There goes Clem with his weasel words again.....'arguable' human life.Nothing weasel about it. The nation is divided on when life begins. How can I offer a definitive opinion?Lie much?Apparently Clem saw many thousands of babies being killed and did nothing.Oh, but they were 'arguable' babies.......nevermind.What am I supposed to do, kidnap abortionists?You have never expressed one single word even of concern about Partial Birth Abortions, as close to infanticide as can occur, arguably literal infanticide.Yet you bleat in fake outrage that woman must be presented with ultrasound images.Cold hearted wackjob.Here's your fake "War on Womyn" exposed for the political claptrap it is. Dems added things they knew Repubs would reject that have nothing to do with womyn, then bleat that Repubs are anti-woman.Any honest person would reject that flatulent nonsense, but not a Democrat Talking Point Liar like you.More on the Democrats Violence Against Women Act HoaxWe noted yesterday that the Democrats have continued their phony war against women campaign by alleging in fundraising appeals that Senate Republicans will oppose re-authorizing the Violence Against Women Act, thereby put[ting] womens lives in danger. This is just one more in a series of Democrat scams, intended to 1) divert attention from the Obama administrations record of failure, and 2) raise money from the Democrats gullible base. What is actually going on, as we wrote yesterday, is that Senate Democrats have slipped extraneous provisions into this years version of the Violence Against Women Act, and have refused to consider the Republican alternative, drafted by Senator Grassley, that strips out those inappropriate provisions or imposes safeguards to prevent their abuse.A Senate Republican background document explains the actual issues that are at stake in the competing versions of VAWA. It says, in part: VAWA has enjoyed bipartisan support since it was enacted in 1994 and in each of its subsequent reauthorizations in 2000 and 2006. Last year, when the Judiciary Committee marked up the bill, it contained controversial provisions that were never included in earlier versions of the bill. It also lacked much needed fraud protection provisions regarding grant funds and immigration. Senator Grassley introduced an amendment that authorized aid for victims and also protected against fraud and misuse of funds. The Democrats refused to work with Republicans to write a bill that could enjoy bipartisan support in Committee.One area of abuse by the Democrats relates to immigration. You may wonder what immigration has to do with the Violence Against Women Act: U-visa expansionhttp://www.powerline...en-act-hoax.php