This is from the WA-TIMES clip I gave you two posts ago:
Flight logs
obtained by Gawker in January 2015 put
Mr. Clinton on the billionaire’s infamous jet more than a dozen times — sometimes with a woman whom federal prosecutors suspect of procuring underage sex victims for
Mr. Epstein. Fox News
reported Friday that records show
Mr. Clinton declined Secret Service protection on at least five flights.
The network’s investigation reveals
Mr. Clinton flew on the Boeing 727 “Lolita Express” 26 times, more than doubling the previously reported 11 trips.
26 trips on the rape moble - five without his secret service detail. So the claim that "the secret service has no record of going to the island" is more clinton parsing. It does not affirmatively make a claim about whether he went to the island. It's lawyer speak - a think tank derived talking point.
And it matters not if he went to the island. 26 flights on a child rape plane. A child rape plane you cannot put trump on ONCE.
Spread the taint - see if that works. Just get this: I CARE. I do not wish to defend a baby raper - not even by the mechanism of blame spreading. But I will not take flattery as evidence of child rape, or even a suggestion of child rape. I see it for what it is on its face: flattery, to be part of the in crowd and avoid making a powerful enemy. In other words, trump being trump.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFDwoE4R484
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?