21 Mar 2012 2:10 pm
Skeptic
posts
Broaddrick was found very credible by Clinton-supporting journalists and had four contemporaneous witnesses who all heard her story immediately after saw her trauma and badly bitten lip, including a nurse who treated it.What evidence do you have that Zimmerman committed a crime?Rotsa ruck, liar.Anyone who'd lie about an actual, real life rape will lie about anything and everything, as you do daily.Try watching the news; read a newspaper - the evidence that Zimmerman is guilty of murder is overwhelming.There is no credible evidence that Broaderick was ever raped. The evidence that Reagan was a rapist is stronger than that.In Kitty Kelley's 1991 book Nancy Reagan: The Unauthorized Biography, actress Selene Walters accused Ronald Reagan of raping her. People magazine did a follow up interview with Walters, and all in all it had about the same credibility as the Juanita Broaddrick story. Except of course, there was no television network devoting most of its time to it, the Wall Street Journal did not devote its editorial page to it, it did not appear as headlines in all the major newspapers, it was not the topic of discussion on every talking head program, and Rush Limbaugh never even mentioned it. In fact I have not seen nor heard any mention of this anywhere by any media source other than on the net. Some liberal media, eh?The call now from the Right and the media is for Clinton to answer to the accusation. When Reagan was approached with the charge by a reporter outside one of his biannual treks to church, he said, "I don't think a church would be the proper place to use the word I would have to use in discussing that." That was a good enough answer for conservatives though.But we have to remember, Ronald Reagan is the moral example of conservative Americans.Divorced, knocked up his bride to be and slapped around his daughter. Bill Clinton did none of those things, but that does not matter because he did far far worse, he got a couple BJ's from a bimbo at work. My linkAuthors of "Stand Your Ground" Law: George Zimmerman Should Probably Be Arrested For Killing Trayvon Martin(CBS/AP) SANFORD, Fla. - The authors of Florida's controversial "stand your ground" self-defense law say George Zimmerman should probably be arrested for shooting Trayvon Martin, reports the Miami Herald."He has no protection under my law," former Sen. Durell Peaden told the newspaper. Florida's law, called "stand your ground" by supporters and "shoot first" by critics, was passed in 2005 and permits residents to use deadly force if they "reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony."Traditionally, self-defense laws did not typically extend beyond a person's home, but the Florida law, and at least 20 more passed across the country since them, allows a resident to "meet force with force" almost anywhere, including the street or a bar.It is the fact that Zimmerman ignored the 911 operator's advice not to follow Martin that former Sen. Peaden says disqualifies him from claiming self-defense under the law."The guy lost his defense right then," Peaden told the Miami Herald. "When he said 'I'm following him,' he lost his defense."Rep. Dennis Baxley, Peaden's co-sponsor in the Florida House, agrees with his former colleague, telling the newspaper that the law does not license neighborhood watch or others who feel "like they have the authority to pursue and confront people. That is aggravating an incident right there."