Liberal Forum

Termin8tor » 29 Jul 2019 8:24 am » wrote:

Misty » 27 Jul 2019 6:16 pm » wrote:Not to annoy you with actual reality but Baghdad Barr said he never even read the underlying evidence.

That Barr accepted Mueller's evidence is proof of Barr's corruption, right?

It's proof that the fix was in.

Mueller's report showed multiple instances of obstruction, and he said that he could not say that Trump did not commit a crime, so how could Baghdad Barr come to that conclusion without even looking at the underlying evidence?