Liberal Forum

Termin8tor » 28 Jul 2019 3:49 pm » wrote:

Misty » 27 Jul 2019 6:16 pm » wrote:The fix was in.
Barr was hired to protect Trump.

Oh my gosh, that's very disturbing!
Except you left this out. From your source:

"We accepted the statements in the report as the actual record. We did not go underneath it to see whether or not they were accurate. We accepted it as accurate," Barr said Wednesday while testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

So what are you saying, that Barr shouldn't have trusted what's in the Mueller Report?

No where in Mueller's report does it say that Trump did not commit obstruction you stupid jackass.
If you had actually read it or watched the hearings you would know that.
Baghdad Barr pulled that out of his ***.

How does this read to you as no obstruction?

"If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the president clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state.

Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards however we are unable to reach that judgment.

The evidence we obtained about the president's actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred."

C'mon you gaping asshole.
Tell me how that translates into no obstruction occured, which is what Baghdad Barr said.
Here's a clue......it doesn't.......he was lying.