Misty » 14 Aug 2019 1:28 pm » wrote:
It was information about George Papadopoulos (a Trump campaign foreign policy adviser) that prompted the FBI investigation, not the dossier.
Look, jids - it'a another Clinton talking point. Good thing I didn't let you play slug bug on
those things - they're
everywhere.
Misty » 14 Aug 2019 1:28 pm » wrote:
That's a Clem talking point.
And I will ask you the same question I asked him, which of course he did not answer.
How did she use the Steele dossier for campaign purposes?
Be specific.
Are you under the impression that the fisa warrant HELPED the trump campaign?
Oh, that's right - you just got through lying that the fisa warrant that was based on the steele dossier wasn't. So THAT'S why you told that lie - to slime the above fake question through.
Well, let's play along with your lie. The dossier had nothing to do with the fisa warrants - nothing at all.
And THAT, according to you, means buying damaging information against your opponent from a foreign source is perfectly legal, so long as no one can
prove that you used it. Clinton law wins, nanny boo boo!
Have you ever even watched a cop show? My cat understands the law better - and I don't even
have a cat.
I do not HAVE to prove she profited from her crime, duh. You don't even DENY that she committed it.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?