Termin8tor » 30 Sep 2019 3:50 pm » wrote:Misty » 30 Sep 2019 3:45 pm » wrote:Termin8tor » 30 Sep 2019 3:25 pm » wrote:The whistle blower is not a whistle blower. He is a partisan hack who abused the law in two or three ways. The law only applies to the intelligence community.
45's Acting DNI said that the whistleblower "did the right thing" and "followed the law every step of the way."
So was he lying under oath?
As a nonpartisan government official, he bent over backwards to give everyone the benefit of the doubt.
You said that the whistleblower abused the law.
Maguire said under oath that he/she followed the law every step of the way.
Both of those things can't be true.
So one of you is lying.
Which one is it Precious?
You or him?