1 Oct 2019 9:15 pm
That was NOT an answer.Termin8tor » 01 Oct 2019 7:56 am » wrote:That is an answer, psycho. A cautious, non-partisan government employee will not stick his neck out and offer controversial opinions until all the facts are out and the proper authorities have offered judgment.Misty » 30 Sep 2019 5:42 pm » wrote:You did NOT answer it you gaping asshole.
What you said was, "As a nonpartisan government official, he (Maguire) bent over backwards to give everyone the benefit of the doubt."
That's not an answer.
Let's try it one more time.
You said that the whistleblower abused the law.
Maguire said UNDER OATH that he/she followed the law every step of the way.
Both of those things can't be true.
So one of you is lying.
Which one is it Precious?
You or him?