7 Nov 2019 8:07 pm
Who is the hack of which you speak oh gaping asshole?Termin8tor » 07 Nov 2019 7:08 pm » wrote:Here's a hint, Dim. It's none of that hack's business that he had concerns.Misty » 07 Nov 2019 6:24 pm » wrote:Yes and several of those people were so concerned about the call that they reported it to WH lawyers, one of which locked it up in a top secret server.Termin8tor » 07 Nov 2019 6:10 pm » wrote:Except that there are five or six people listening.
So this is your latest wackjob conspiracy theory, that the transcript isn't accurate?
You're kidding, right?
Why would he have done that, if as Trump insists, the call was 'perfect?'
WTF does that even mean, other than that he was a leftist Deep State hack intent on undermining a president he didn't like?
Surely you don't mean Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman.
I have no idea what you are talking about.Termin8tor » 07 Nov 2019 7:08 pm » wrote:In fact his superior office was so disturbed by this hack's attitude that he reprimanded him.More will come out that will completely discredit him.
Is that from your precious gatewaypundit or is that another pearl you pulled straight out of your ***?
Riddle me this you big **** gaping asshole, why was the actual transcript of the call hidden in a top secret server meant only to be used for the most sensitive matters of national security like covert actions?
And don't bother to deny it.
They admitted it.
https://www.nydailynews.com/news/politi ... story.html
Isn't it ironic that Trump did nothing wrong but refuses to let anyone testify on his behalf.
Surely if they had anything to say that would exonerate him, he would allow them to speak.
Don'tcha think?