Liberal Forum

Planned Parenthood, we're going to get rid of that.Not positive, but I think what Mitt wants to do is end the tax payer part of funding abortion. Not yanking tax payer cash for pap smears and cervical cancer screening and mamograms and such. Of course the hard part is keeping the planned parent subsidy and making sure planned parenthood does not contnue using that specific cash for abortions, you know? Kinda like the big Americans for prosperity bru-ha-ha a wile back where Americans for Prosperity was gettin cash from all sorts of folks and didn't make a specific account for that cash to make sure that cash didn't go to campaign advertisments.And this makes sense, to me. I have no problem with some of my tax dollars going to planned parenthood for non-abortion medical procedures, but I don't want my tax payer cash going to abortions. I'm pro-choice, barely, don't push it.Misty, the devil is in the details on this one.I suggest you go find the details, the youtube, or a transcript or sumpin from Mitt's site and prove to me that he wants to specifically end all support of planned parenthood and then maybe I'll come around to your side on this one issue.In other words... more horse, less monkey.