User avatar
Nobody
30 Jan 2020 5:56 pm
30 Jan 2020 5:56 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Why Chief Justice Roberts refused to read a question from Rand Paul at Trump’s trial.

Chief Justice John Roberts on Thursday refused to read a question from Sen. Rand Paul that appeared intended to out the whistleblower whose complaint eventually led to the impeachment investigation.

“The presiding officer declines to read the question as submitted,” said Roberts, after Paul offered the written question.

Paul’s inquiry, according to tweets he later posted, focused on the relationship between a staffer at the House Intelligence Committee and someone he may have worked with at the National Security Council, naming two specific individuals. He went on to add that he had no “independent information” about who the whistleblower was.

“I think this is an important question, one that deserves to be asked. It makes no reference to anybody who may or may not be a whistleblower,” Paul told reporters at a press briefing. One of the names he mentions, however, has been floated by some conservative publications as the potential whistleblower.

It’s the second time in the Senate’s two days of questioning that this scenario has played out; on Wednesday, Roberts told lawmakers that he would not read questions that could include the identity of a whistleblower, seemingly dismissing a submission from Paul, according to Politico.

Paul is among the members of the GOP who’ve been eager to use the focus on the whistleblower to divert attention from the abuse of power Trump is charged with committing. “Do your job and print his name!” Paul yelled at the press during a rally last fall.
There is only one reason at this point to out the whistleblower's name.

Revenge.

His or her life would be in danger from Trump's angry mob of goons, and would be basically destroyed.
And all for doing the right thing.
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search