User avatar
Nobody
11 Feb 2020 7:17 pm
11 Feb 2020 7:17 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 11 Feb 2020 7:03 pm » wrote:
Misty » 26 Jan 2020 2:31 pm » wrote:Why are there three ellipses?
What was left out?
And it is NOT an actual transcript.
It says so right on the front page.
Twice in a press conference earlier this month, Trump went out of his way to say the rough transcript was, in fact, a verbatim recounting of his call with Zelensky. "I had a transcript done by very, very talented people -- word for word, comma for comma," said Trump at one point in that early October news conference. "Done by people that do it for a living. We had an exact transcript." Later, he added that the document was "an exact transcript of my call, done by very talented people that do this -- exact, word for word."
Trump echoed that sentiment on Twitter as well.
That's a big fat lie!
Gosh, Zindman himself testified that the transcript was accurate.
Should he be indicted for perjury, psycho? :rofl:
Again....it's NOT a **** transcript.
He might have said that the summary of the call was accurate, but he thought it was political, and therefore improper.
Colonel Vindman and Ms. Williams were the first two witnesses at a public hearing who listened in real time to Mr. Trump’s now-infamous July call with President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine. Both said they were alarmed; Ms. Williams called the call “unusual and inappropriate” while Colonel Vindman said it was “wrong.”
[.......]
Colonel Vindman testified that he believed that Mr. Trump’s request for Ukraine to open investigations into the “2016 election, the Bidens and Burisma” — inquiries that could help Mr. Trump’s re-election chances — should be viewed as demands that were “inappropriate and had nothing to do with national security.”
[......]
Ms. Williams and Colonel Vindman added texture to the frustration inside the government about the shadow Ukraine foreign policy being conducted by the president’s personal lawyer Rudolph W. Giuliani and others.

Colonel Vindman testified that he quickly became aware of “former mayor Rudy Giuliani’s promoting false narratives that undermined the United States’ Ukraine policy.”

Their testimony confirms many of the other impeachment witnesses who have described Mr. Giuliani, who has no official government job, as having an outsize role in influencing Mr. Trump’s position on Ukraine.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/19/us/p ... hment.html
And why are you replying to posts from January?
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search