6 Mar 2020 3:42 pm
Digging through the fine print?Termin8tor » 06 Mar 2020 2:55 pm » wrote:I'm not digging through the fine print of a letter that many conservative source have already refuted in detail.Misty » 06 Mar 2020 2:51 pm » wrote:Not in this letter he didn't.Termin8tor » 06 Mar 2020 2:29 pm » wrote:Mueller said he agreed with Barr's conclusions.
You're a **** riot.
It's basically a one page letter and I even cut out the pertinent paragraph for you, so there is nothing for you to dig through.
As usual you refuse to look at the actual facts and prefer to remain willfully ignorant.
Barr is a **** liar.Termin8tor » 06 Mar 2020 2:55 pm » wrote:And Barr testified about this matter.
A Bush appointed federal judge just said so.
You don't need to 'dig' through anything.
Just read the part on bold print.
A federal judge on Thursday strongly criticized Attorney General William Barr's disclosure of the Mueller report last year, calling early statements about special counsel Robert Mueller's conclusions "misleading."
In an order in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit seeking access to the unredacted report, U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton said Barr's action caused him "to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller report in favor of President Trump."
Walton focused on Barr's initial statement — before the report was released in full — that Mueller's team did not find that anyone in the Trump campaign conspired with Russian efforts to meddle in the 2016 election.
The judge said Barr left out the fact that the report identified contacts between members of the Trump campaign and people connected with the Russian government.
Barr's "lack of candor," Walton wrote in a 23-page ruling in Washington, calls into question the credibility of Barr and the Justice Department in making redactions to the report.
For that reason, Walton ordered government lawyers to give him the complete report so he can evaluate whether the material was properly blacked out.
Barr has previously defended his handling of the report, including his decision to make its main conclusions public even before the full document was released.
Walton said Barr "can be commended for his effort to expeditiously release a summary."
But Walton said he wondered whether Barr's intention "was to create a one-sided narrative about the Mueller report."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justic ... t-n1151076