6 Mar 2020 8:55 pm
Gatewaypundit.......Termin8tor » 06 Mar 2020 7:11 pm » wrote:We can call him confused and ignorant.Misty » 06 Mar 2020 6:20 pm » wrote:This story is picking up steam.
Holy ****!
A federal judge said the AG is untrustworthy.
Can't call this one an Obama judge.
And if he doesn't offer a correction, I'd say he's a Beltway hack.Justice Department Hits Back After Judge Slams Attorney General Barr, Orders DOJ to Turn Over Unredacted Mueller Report
Cristina Laila by Cristina Laila
....The DOJ hit back and said “the court’s assertions were contrary to the facts.”
“The original redactions in the public report were made by Department attorneys, in consultation with senior members of Special Counsel Mueller’s team, prosecutors in US Attorney’s Offices, and members of the Intelligence Community,” the DOJ said.
“In response to FOIA requests, the entire report was then reviewed by career attorneys, including different career attorneys with expertise in FOIA cases — a process in which the Attorney General played no role.”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/0 ... er-report/
This is not about the redactions in the Mueller report, it is about Barr's 4 page summary of the Mueller report.
Did you even read your own link?
The Judge said US Attorney General Bill Barr ‘lacked candor’ and accused him of intentionally creating a misleading summary of ‘principal conclusions’ to create a “one-sided narrative” about the Mueller report.
“The inconsistencies between Attorney General Barr’s statements, made at a time when the public did not have access to the redacted version of the Mueller Report to assess the veracity of his statements, and portions of the redacted version of the Mueller Report that conflict with those statements cause the Court to seriously question whether Attorney General Barr made a calculated attempt to influence public discourse about the Mueller Report in favor of President Trump despite certain findings in the redacted version of the Mueller Report to the contrary,” Walton said.