16 Nov 2012 10:42 am
MistyBlue, on 15 November 2012 - 09:53 PM, said:What Susan Rice Actually Said On Face The NationI know what she said.Slowbama, the half-breed stuttering muslim said in the foreign policy debate that he said in the Rose Garden that the Benghazi attack was a terrorist attack. This was Sept. 12.Slow said in his press conference the other day that Susan Rice was under his direction to go onto the Sunday shows where she definitively, unequivocally stated that the Benghazi attack was a protest over the internet video. This was Sept. 16.Wrong. She said it was a group of 'extremists'.Here's what Rice said on another Sunday show on ABC: But our current best assessment, based on the information that we have at present, is that, in fact, what this began as, it was a spontaneous not a premeditated response to what had transpired in Cairo. In Cairo, as you know, a few hours earlier, there was a violent protest that was undertaken in reaction to this very offensive video that was disseminated.We believe that folks in Benghazi, a small number of people came to the embassy to or to the consulate, rather, to replicate the sort of challenge that was posed in Cairo. And then as that unfolded, it seems to have been hijacked, let us say, by some individual clusters of extremists who came with heavier weapons, weapons that as you know in in the wake of the revolution in Libya are are quite common and accessible. And it then evolved from there.http://www.slate.com...i_take_two.htmlI know you are a liberal and will excuse any behavior by your guys, and I know for a fact that in a case like this, where your guys a dead caught lying that you will point to someone else, Bush and his, usually, with "the other guy did it too" defence, but you know, Misty, this ain't Karl Rove and Scooter Libby, in this one there is dead people and Slow is lying about it.Who is lying? Obama called it an act of terror the next day, and Susan Rice (who was only relaying the intelligence she was given that morning) said it was a group of 'extremists'. Not protesters.The question I keep coming back to, which no one seems to be able to answer is, what would have been the motivation to lie about whether or not this was a terrorist attack? For what reason?What do you think Obama was trying to cover up?