16 Nov 2012 2:45 pm
teacher
posts
Wrong. She said it was a group of 'extremists'.Here's what Rice said on another Sunday show on ABC:I don't need all that, I watched them Sunday shows my damn self. Susan Rice stated unequivocally that the Benghazi attack was a protest over the internet video.1:55 in for about a minute...Who is lying?Slow is lying Obama called it an act of terror the next day, Show me where. I watched that $h!t and you can't do it. Not unless you take out a couple minutes of video of Slow in the Rose Garden and splice that crap together.and Susan Rice (who was only relaying the intelligence she was given that morning) Show me where I've said Susan Rice was not only repeating the information she was given. She was lied to. By Slow.Her word at 2:27 into that youtube... "spontaneous."said it was a group of 'extremists'. Not protesters.She can call it a ham sandwich for all I care. This was a planned, well coordinated terrorist attack. Don't insult my intelligence, which is vast, by trying to play words games here.The narrative of the left, until they were caught red handed, was that this was a reaction to the video. Would you like me to go find Jay Carney saying it? Would you like me to go find Slow saying it six(6) times in his speech to the UN? Would you like me to go find Slow saying it on the view? Would you like me to go find Slow saying this to Univision?He's a lying fu(kin azzhole. End of story.The question I keep coming back to, which no one seems to be able to answer is,Really? No one? Seems to me you didn't try that hard to find someone to answer that when the friggin horse thread is just around the corner.what would have been the motivation to lie about whether or not this was a terrorist attack? For what reason?What do you think Obama was trying to cover up?Because Slow has been going around saying that Al Qaeda is about finished. That he has a handle on this terror deal. He, personally, the way Slow tells it, killed Bin Laden. And on and on and on... It's all a bunch of crap and this Benghazi attack puts the lie to it. And then you start this thread?C I A Approved Susan Rice's Talking Points On Libya According to GOP Rep Peter King by MistyI JUST watched Peter King on this not a couple of hours ago. Did you?He said exactly the opposite.Patreaus testified today that the CIA's position was that the Benghazi attack WAS a terrorist attack. He said that this language was taken out of the brief somewhere between the CIA and Susan Rice's appearance on the Sunday talks shows. Even more distressing is that the committee that Peter King was on could not get an answer to exactly who took that language out of the brief. He said that the folks before the committee were explicitly asked that today and no one would give an answer. So the administration is STILL playing the shell game. How the fu(k can they not know who it was that said, "yea, don't say that?" There's only so many people here, Misty. And remember, Slow himself said in his press conference that HE was the one who sent Susan Rice out to the Sunday talks shows.Wiggle outta that $h!t.