11 Jun 2020 5:41 pm
It wasn't a violent riot until Trump ordered his goons to attack.Termin8tor » 08 Jun 2020, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑Why would the clergy be near a violent riot?Misty » 03 Jun 2020, 4:50 pm » wrote: ↑When did you condemn the fact that a chemical agent was used on members of the clergy to clear the way for Trump's ridiculous photo op?
I won't wait, because you will lie and say that never happened.
It was a peaceful protest.
And members of the clergy were sitting on church property offering water and snacks to the demonstrators who were denouncing racism and police brutality.
Look who's talking.Termin8tor » 08 Jun 2020, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑No "chemical agents" were used, psycho. You're getting to the point where almost everything you write is a lie.
You're repeating the same filthy lie that Barr told.
He said that the pepper balls which were used to clear the peaceful protesters from Lafayette Square were NOT chemical agents.
On a Sunday morning news show, U.S. Attorney General William Barr said federal officers used no chemical irritants to disperse a crowd of people near a Washington, D.C., church President Donald Trump was due to visit.
Appearing on CBS News’ “Face the Nation,” Barr said the U.S. Park Police and Secret Service used “standard crowd control” methods during the June 1 action.
Host Margaret Brennan reminded him that the Park Police had said chemical irritants were used.
“No, there were not chemical irritants,” Barr said June 7.
“Pepper spray is not a chemical irritant. It’s not chemical.”
Brennan interjected: “Pepper spray, you’re saying, is what was used.”
“Pepper balls. Pepper balls,” Barr clarified.
Barr’s statement about chemical irritants is wrong.
The Park Police issued a statement saying its units fired pepper balls, a product that contains a chemical irritant.
https://khn.org/news/attorney-general-b ... -they-did/