User avatar
Huey
16 Oct 2020 9:53 am
User avatar
      
37,293 posts
Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑ Dwarf,

I've made the point..

Repeatedly..

You've been diverting and dissembling.

AR15 rifles are sold to civilians ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY because they look like a military weapon (not entirely coincidentally, as it was designed and developed as such). They were NOT designed or developed for any civilian application...they were modified to conform with existing laws, so Colt could sell more units from their fixed capacity investment in the military orders for AR 15s.

Because the modifications only limit the original functionality at the margin, they can be "overridden", and its limitations from such modification overcome.

What function are they limiting?  Next, your passage only relates to colt.  Once the license ran out many companies that are not involved in military rifles designed semi auto sports weapons and dubbed them ARs.  Why they should they be banned?  
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search