User avatar
Blackvegetable
16 Oct 2020 10:12 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
59,315 posts
Huey » 16 Oct 2020, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑ This is more than a modification.  It is a whole new internal design: 

To prevent a civilian semi-automatic AR-15 from being readily converted for use with the select fire components, several features were changed. Parts changed include the lower receiver, bolt carrier, hammer, trigger, disconnector, and safety/mode selector. The semi-automatic bolt carrier has a longer lightening slot to prevent the bolt's engagement with an automatic sear. Due to a decrease in mass, the buffer spring is heavier. On the select-fire version, the hammer has an extra spur which interacts with the additional auto-sear that holds it back until the bolt carrier group is fully in battery, when the automatic fire is selected.[54] Using a portion of the select fire parts in a semi-automatic rifle will not enable a select fire option (this requires a registered part with the ATF). Lower receivers that are select-fire are identified by a pinhole above the safety/mode selection switch.[55][56][57][58] As designed by Colt the pins supporting the semi-auto trigger and hammer in the lower receiver are larger than those used in the military rifle to prevent interchangeability between semi-automatic and select-fire components.[59]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AR-15_style_rifle#:~:text=As%20of%20September%2019%2C%202019,rifle%20across%20the%20firearms%20industry.

That applies to the Colt Sporter.  Notice all the parts that had to be changed and redesigned? So no, the Sporter was not designed for the battlefield.
several features were changed.
If it was DESIGNED for civilian use, why would anything need to be "changed" to make it legal for civilians to use?
Updated 1 minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search