Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2020, 1:57 pm

You ran from this before...

For what conflict was the henry 45 designed?

A sabre was designed for "battle".....I don't have an issue with collectors, but I draw the line at carry, concealed or otherwise...

an assault weapon, as one of its principal features, is designed to kill in volume and to leave the wounded requiring a lot of assets to repair.

This has no civilian application. Accordingly, a weapon designed for such satisfies no legitimate civilian purpose...

 

For what conflict was the henry 45 designed?

So now you want to specify conflicts.  The original design was 1860.  But wait, there's more in the next answer.

an assault weapon, as one of its principal features, is designed to kill in volume and to leave the wounded requiring a lot of assets to repair.

Well, the civilian version is not auto and is not designed to kill in volume.  The henry repeating rifle is designed to fire as many shots as a semi auto sports rifle can in the same time frame.  So that point is irrelevant.  

This has no civilian application. Accordingly, a weapon designed for such satisfies no legitimate civilian purpose..

And that is why those made after 86 are banned and those before are heavily regulated.  Now please stick to semi automatic weapons.  If they were designed to be mass killing machines they would have been marketed to the military.  Why weren't they?  Speaking of running.....