User avatar
Huey
16 Oct 2020 3:41 pm
User avatar
      
37,293 posts
Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑ No...stupid..

If a military weapon is modified for civilian use, it is a military weapon modified for civilian use.....not a trowel.
*******, those parts that had to be redesigned?  That is the guts of the weapon.  Those parts are what make that weapon designed for battlefield use. Those are the engine so to speak of a combat assault rifle.  Nod if you understand? 

When you replace those parts with the below parts, that were redesigned, you have removed what makes it a weapon for battlefield use.  With the below parts it is no longer a combat weapon.  And as the source provided says you can not interchange the parts to make it automatic.

Yes, it is a redesign.  Not a modification.  A modification would be adding a mount for a scope, or changing where the charging handle is.  They built a new weapon.  

So kiss my Irish *** Average Guy.

This is a lower receiver:
Image
  On the selector area notice something missing?

This is the bolt carrier:

Image

This is the disconnector:

ImageImage
That is the hammer.

 
 
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search