17 Oct 2020 11:10 am
Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2020, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑Huey » 16 Oct 2020, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Again, my henry 45 repeating rifle was designed specifically for combat. You want that banned as well?
So although none of the weapons you want banned fit the category of "designed for the battlefield" you want them banned because of broad appeal. Now that is just plain stupid.You ran from this before...my henry 45 repeating rifle was designed specifically for combat.
For what conflict was the henry 45 designed?A sabre was designed for "battle".....I don't have an issue with collectors, but I draw the line at carry, concealed or otherwise...So although none of the weapons you want banned fit the category of "designed for the battlefield"
an assault weapon, as one of its principal features, is designed to kill in volume and to leave the wounded requiring a lot of assets to repair.
This has no civilian application. Accordingly, a weapon designed for such satisfies no legitimate civilian purpose...
FOS » 17 Oct 2020, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑You didn't say anything about the round. You said nothing tangible. I finally just had to give you something to demonstrate how an actual debate looks like. You aren't capable.Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ You mean the modifications can't overcome the purpose for which it was designed?
That's brilliant...thanks for sharing.