Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:14 am

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 11:12 am

It is not a pointless question Mr 800.  Your argument is the AR 15 semi automatic is a weapon designed for the battlefield and should be banned.  We have established that weapons in the context of the thread have been banned or so heavily restricted most can't get one.  We have established that the major pieces that make a weapon a combat assault weapon  are redesigned to make it not a combat weapon.  That is no longer a point of contention.  

With that said if you claim it is a weapon for the battlefield you should be able to tell us why the US Government did not Purchase a Semi Automatic weapon as it's primary assault weapon for the troops.  Why haven't they?

Your argument is the AR 15 semi automatic is a weapon designed for the battlefield

Of what system is the AR15 the semi automatic variant?

 

Huey » 17 Oct 2020, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 9:53 am

Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

17 Oct 2020, 9:44 am

This is how **** stupid you are...

The AR 15 is the semi automatic variant of the M16...

For what function was the M16 "designed"?

The M16 s a lightweight, 5.56 mm, air-cooled, gas-operated, magazine-fed assault rifle, with a rotating bolt capable of semi auto and full auto.  It is capable of a cyclic rate of fire of700-950 rounds.  It has a maximum range of 3.600 meters, a maximum effective range of a point target of 550 meters and and a maximum effective range for an area target of 800 meters.  It was designed to be the primary combat weapon for the US Military