User avatar
Huey
17 Oct 2020 2:43 pm
User avatar
      
37,293 posts
Blackvegetable » 17 Oct 2020, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑ You haven't explained why these questions are relevant...In spite of its lack of relevance #1 has been answered..

Now answer the question, or admit defeat.
Your argument was, and since rescinded, is the AR 15 semi auto was designed for the battlefield based on the M16.  Although I have shown otherwise,  and shown the AR 15 was mass produced PRIOR to the M16, you persist.  Then you claimed no one said the AR 15 was designed for battlefield use.  You lil man need to pick an argument.  All this winning on me part bores me.

If you are going back to your original argument that the AR 15 is a variant of the M16 and is designed for the battlefield anyone with knowledge of the topic understands in order to make that argument you have to answer the below questions.  But you are a man who I doubt has an IQ in triple digits and you don’t have the intellect to understand that simple concept.

1.  If the AR 15 semi auto rifle was designed for the battlefield (it wasn’t) why wasn’t it issued To US Combat troops?  Especially since it was mass produced BEFORE the M 16?  How long you gonna run from that question?

2.  What capabilities and functions does the AR 15 Semi auto rifle share with the M 16?
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search