User avatar
Huey
18 Oct 2020 11:27 am
User avatar
      
37,293 posts
Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2020, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑ are you **** kidding, Chalk Outline?
No.  Your only argument is to screech it is a “variant” of a M16, that was designed for battlefield use, and it appeals to certain group of people you don’t like do to appearance.

I can find nothing in the NFA of 1934 NOR the Amendments that ban firearms for those reasons.  So what capabilities does this designed for civilian use semi automatic rifle share with the M16 that makes it a NFA weapon?  

You share that and you win.  I don’t want to see the word variant, appeals or battlefield use.  The specific capabilities and function that makes it a NFA weapon.
 
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search