duck615 » 19 Oct 2020, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑
Misty » 19 Oct 2020, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑So....first you said that he didn't admit that he owed the money, and now you say that he broke no laws by owing the money.
Move the goalpost much?
Is there solid proof that someone saw his taxes? Yes or No
All I said was that the Times got it right about how much money he owed, because he confirmed that himself.
How would they know that if they hadn't seen his returns?
I'm not playing your little game of verbal gymnastics.
As soon as I prove one point, you just change the question.
Buh bye.