18 Jan 2013 3:40 pm
I knew rich clem.I accused rich clem of child molestation and glory holing.G00fboy is no rich clem.ROFLI've been doing a search for an old post and have come across some good stuff.Clem started a thread whining about how Liberals were fleeing him.It appears that many if not most liberals have fled to the Liberals only section or to another debate board, as I would have predicted. I thought they'd last a little longer.A great poster named rem had the best response.......Does anyone know who let RC back in? Was there a budget cut at the loony bin where he normally resides and they needed his bed for "sicker" people?Does anyone know what happened to RC's history of 10,000+ old posts, which clearly demonstrate time & time again that he is an hypocritical liar, an unworthy debate opponent and a foaming maniac who commonly mistakes viagra for ritalin.Being wrong is NO deterrent to this guy - he'll still drone ON, and ON and ON like a chatty Kathy doll completely undeterred by reality, and then he'll keep going. That's not debate, rather its akin to a discussion with the most belligerent drunkard fool at the party.The thing about RC is if you suck at debate he'll take you down and biatch slap you a few times along the way, and wrap up with a nice straw man labelling you as a typical liberal. You see, predatorily attacking the weak while posing as a good Christian is typical demonic or chicken hawk Neocon behavior. If you're a decent debater he'll insult your intelligence with endless circular arguments &, for example, compare high crimes against humanity happening now to lying about a bj many years ago without noticing any differentiating nuance. Neocons are also color blind, except when it comes to race.Its not a question of fleeing debate, its a question of needing space from trolls & the pitifully narrow minded. Even if minus 20% of Americans support war criminal Bush and five more Katrina's happened, RC would still be his loyal, yappy lapdoggy googling up excuses for his evil master. But if you could look at RC's history, you'd see that he used to repeatedly grind statistics in our faces when a minority of Americans were against the Iraq war. That does not deter him one iota now that he is clearly on the lunatic fringe. This is not a problem for RC, he just drops statistical data from his vernacular.Instead of admitting how wrong his predictions were and learning from his mistakes, he just comes back for more of the same with his signature ad nauseam arguments. Don't be deterred RC, perhaps liberal professors plotting to destroy America are now conducting the statistical studies.Anyway, its getting late and I forgot to feed the cat.There was a good poster named Pundit Hater who Clem stalked until he left the forum. He came back as political-forum-guy for a while, then Clem drove him away for good.I came to offer a warning, though, as in "UH OH!"Rich said: "And why don't you respond to the rest of my points?"He's starting his back-door slide. Anyone who's been here a while has seen it all before, repeatedly, and most recently in his stalking of me. He's going to try to wear you down with sheer stamina, you see, and keep stating the same things over and over again.After a while, you'll just tell him that, "I answered your stupid questions." He'll ignore that and ask them again, and again, and again.He'll start going into all of your threads, and even into threads in which you don't participate, and claim, "That's why he ran from debate and wouldn't answer my questions. Liberals flee debate, reality!"You'll appeal to others to referee, as I did, perhaps, and they'll all say, "Rich, he answered you a dozen times! Let it go!"And he won't. And he'll compile lists of anything untoward you ever said in the heat of debate (and over months of debate) and splatter them out there in a single posting to make you sound like a nasty guy (all the while splattering his every post with demeaning and mocking insults).Eventually he'll probably quote someone else (unattributed) on something he thinks he can defeat (usually something personal about him) and mock you and say "What about that, huh?" If you catch him in this dirty trick, as OldPat recently did and as happened twice with the same quote in my fight with him over at BANNED WORD (which was first corrected by the original poster he had quoted, and then corrected by me two weeks later when he tried the same thing again) he'll say, "Aw geez, I made a mistake." Except it's not a mistake - it's a technique that's going to force you to be ever-vigilant or get smeared because anytime you miss Rich's dirty trick, he'll shine it uglier on you.In the meantime, he'll continue to distort what you actually type, as you've wonderfully caught and clobbered repeatedly. He's pretty clever - with me, he did things like leave off the "S" in the word "failure" to make a very sound and logical point seem like hyperbole.Just a public warning to you, and to anyone bothering to take the lunatic seriously.Oh, I'm sorry, the "honorable" lunatic seriously.PH (who can't get deleted, apparently)I swear when I read Pundit Hater's posts I'm amazed at how much they mirror my own posts in regards to Clem's behavior.And when I read the things that Clem said to Pundit Hater and the way he hounded him, it's like Deja Vu.