Liberal Forum

Misty » Today, 8:25 pm » wrote: Anyone who can call a man who slept with the daughter of a woman he once had a relationship with 'a very decent person' has no idea what the word decent means. Decent people don't do that ****, Kitten.

Oh, sure, you're shocked and horrified that when a 30-something woman tried to have an affair with Fund, he went along.

Save your bulls*** for the moonbats, psycho, especially given your long, long, LONG history of defending felons and rapists.

I had heard something about John Fund sleeping with his ex-girlfriend's daughter, but I didn't know any details, so I merely asked a question about it.
I never said she was underage. As soon as I looked it up, I learned that she was an adult at the time.

F*** off. Your immediate instinct is to lie and smear, regardless of facts.

Only a psychopath would smear someone as a child molester without knowing the evidence.
Just as only a psychopath would tell years of lies in defense of a serial rapist/ serial felon without knowing the evidence.

I don't care if it was 100 years later and she was 50 years old, it's still wrong, and he's still a pervert.

Someone's a "pervert" for going along with a 30-something woman trying to seduce you, many years after he had an affair with her mother?

Nor did you say it was "wrong." Had that been all you'd done, I wouldn't care in the slightest. Instead, your smeared him as a child molester, and f*** your usual "gosh-I-was-only-asking" bulls***.