31 Dec 2013 7:35 am
The Constitution does not give the government the authority to nation build in ****, either. But you quibble on condoms...Huey » 31 Dec 2013 7:20 am » wrote:
No, I felt the need to relay my opinion on government intrusion into sexual activities. I have stated numerous times that what one does sexually is of no concern of mine. If you feel the need to **** a women, a man, a sheep, a goat, etc. that is your choice. I don't care. Have at it.
With that said I should not have to pay for your elective choices. I should not have to pay extra for contraceptive services, abortificients, maternity, etc to subsidize your elective sexual activities. The reason I mention the above is that Prattle, Misty, and other progs turn every discussion of these services into one of having hangups about sex. They can't stay on the topic. And every time they do I will tick off a list of sexual activities that some consider perversions. The Constitution does not give the federal government the authority to be involved. So I could care less.
I hope this clears up any misunderstanding that you may have.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?