IkeBana » 01 Aug 2021, 6:21 am » wrote: ↑
We've already had this conversation and apparently the dementia has become more severe and you've forgotten all about how you actually credited me for being a legitimate pro-choice advocate because my advocacy was absent the religious dogma and political **** and built only on medical confidentiality law and that the decisions made by a woman and her physician are nobody's **** business but theirs.
Take a **** Aricept and call me in the morning, rent boi.
Pay attention, fruit loop.
You subscribe to the notion that a man - that is, a human being with a penis and a scrotum - has a "civil right" to shower with women, to invade their sports, to be their cell mates in prisons, to be housed in shelters for battered women, and to otherwise demand to be treated as women - based on his PURPORTED INNER FEELINGS.
That position childishly ignores that criminally inclined men are perfectly capable of "lying" (this means not telling the truth) about their "inner feelings" in order to get access to and abuse women in vulnerable circumstances (like showers and jail cells and batter-shelters). You are a rape enabling cuck.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?