Liberal Forum

RichClem » 15 Jan 2014 8:43 am » wrote: It claims to be first hand. How typically trollish that you refuse to accept facts cited from my excellent, time-tested sources on the flatulent excuse that they're contained in opeds, but cite a totally non-credible moonbat source.
No, nothing from that source can be trusted.

Not even the actual audio recordings of John Fund and Morgan Pillsbury's phone conversations?
Of course you didn't listen to those did you?
Because if you did that would put to rest your false narrative that John Fund was just some poor innocent victim of a jezebel.

Clem: It's hardly my fault that you have endless excuses not to read my sources; that you go blind when key facts are cited.

You NEVER posted any proof that Morgan Pillsbury was 31 at the time that John Fund seduced her.
There is no proof of that because she was 23.

Do you really believe that anyone is buying your **** about how you've posted 'endless sources' on any given subject?
They're not, and you are the only one who makes endless excuses to discount without even looking at, any sources that might prove that your so-called 'facts' (the ones you pulled from your ***) are not true.