Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 10 Jul 2024, 4:59 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jul 2024, 4:59 pm

You obliged this move and now you forget the context.

You praise Grifty's acuity, but here he is failing to identify two of three of his wives and misidentifying his other rape victim as one of them.

LMAO! You should have led with that. If that is all you got your party is in serious trouble.  

Oh, a Jury did not find him liable for rape.  The jurors specifically rejected that charge. Which is odd because the burden of proof is so much lower in a civil trial.  It was the judge the reinterpreted the verdict, probably because "rape" was the expected outcome and like a good little goose stepper who obliged.   Not to mention she is serial "rape" accuser.

The verdict was split: Jurors rejected Carroll’s claim that she was raped, finding Trump responsible for a lesser degree of sexual abuse. The judgment adds to Trump’s legal woes and offers vindication to Carroll, whose allegations had been mocked and dismissed by Trump for years.

https://apnews.com/article/trump-rape-c ... f9ec83d7db

You are gonna have to stop this game of generalities and ambiguities and make a point.  

We all know that frightens you.  You are not going to get the wiggle room you seek.  This is all about your argument.  And do far you don't have one.