User avatar
Blackvegetable
10 Jul 2024 5:14 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
59,315 posts
*Huey » 10 Jul 2024, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑ LMAO! You should have led with that. If that is all you got your party is in serious trouble.  

Oh, a Jury did not find him liable for rape.  The jurors specifically rejected that charge. Which is odd because the burden of proof is so much lower in a civil trial.  It was the judge the reinterpreted the verdict, probably because "rape" was the expected outcome and like a good little goose stepper who obliged.   Not to mention she is serial "rape" accuser.

The verdict was split: Jurors rejected Carroll’s claim that she was raped, finding Trump responsible for a lesser degree of sexual abuse. The judgment adds to Trump’s legal woes and offers vindication to Carroll, whose allegations had been mocked and dismissed by Trump for years.

https://apnews.com/article/trump-rape-c ... f9ec83d7db

You are gonna have to stop this game of generalities and ambiguities and make a point.  

We all know that frightens you.  You are not going to get the wiggle room you seek.  This is all about your argument.  And do far you don't have one.
I did.

But you refused to look.

F'n A.
 
Updated 2 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search