21 Jan 2014 9:37 pm
Hey, nice job at trying to cover up two falsehoods you told, by cutting out a key part of my post.Misty » 21 Jan 2014 7:22 pm » wrote: You don't even understand what this ruling is about do you?
You just know that if I'm against it, you have to be for it.
The court is about to rule on whether they should strike down the 35 foot buffer zone laws that are in place now Jackhole.
If they do women will once again be forced to run a gauntlet in order to undergo a valid, legal, and constitutionally protected medical procedure.
Obviously you didn't even read the editorial before you dismissed it out of hand.
The law was originally enacted in response to decades of harassment targeted at people seeking entry into women’s healthcare and abortion clinics and a 1994 shooting rampage that killed two people at a Brookline Planned Parenthood clinic.
Troll.
No one is allowed to block clinic entrances. That is illegal and remains so.
No one is allowed on private property. That is trespassing, illegal and remains so.
No one is allowed to be "at the entrance." That is trespassing, illegal and remains so.
And no one is defending "blocking." That is illegal and remains so.
Thirty five feet removes them from public property adjacent to the clinic, like sidewalks, and violates their Constitutional rights.