22 Jan 2014 10:17 pm
That's not what this Supreme Court case is about.Misty » 22 Jan 2014 7:20 pm » wrote: They are interfering with women trying to access a legal medical procedure.
It's about free speech on public property.
People who interfere are subject to arrest.
And neither is that.Two receptionists were shot and killed and five others wounded by one of these anti-abortion activists in two clinic attacks in Massachusetts in 1994.
Are you just babbling, trying to ignore what the actual court case is?
