Today 8:42 am
The journal alone is not sufficient evidence. Her testimony would be required.GHETTOBLASTER » Today, 2:02 am » wrote: ↑ There doesn't need to be "sufficient evidence"
The fact that he repeatedly showered with his daughter is all I need to know about that sorry excuse for a man.
It comes as no surprise to see a sorry excuse for a man [like you] trying to defend the honor of your fellow "sorry excuse for a man".
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/joe-b ... r-BB1mWabj
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?