Today 11:23 am
EDC4ALL! » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Dude, read the links I posted. I believe one was from Cornell Law and the other is a big victims organization. No, touching is NOT necessary to be molestation
blah blah blah.
You are free to INFER whatever the **** you want to. The FACT remains that there is NOTHING in that diary that PROVES that Joe molested his daughter. Just deal with it, but I am done playing silly word games with you.
Why don't you shift targets and start defending "Martin Luther King on Steroids." Joe is old news. Mark Robinson is front page.
