maineman » Today, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑
blah blah blah.
You are free to INFER whatever the **** you want to. The FACT remains that there is NOTHING in that diary that PROVES that Joe molested his daughter. Just deal with it, but I am done playing silly word games with you.
Why don't you shift targets and start defending "Martin Luther King on Steroids." Joe is old news. Mark Robinson is front page.
so I shoved the definition of MOLESTATION up your *** so now you deflect. If he showered with his minor daughter that's MOLESTATION.