Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Kamala Harris snubbed by another major labor union — that was first to back Biden in 2020: ‘It’s a big shift’
Yesterday 9:55 pm
This sounds like a refutation of your scandalous vaccine fascism to me.maineman » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Goal #1: Protecting Life, Conscience, and Bodily Integrity. The Secretary
should pursue a robust agenda to protect the fundamental right to life, protect con-
science rights, and uphold bodily integrity rooted in biological realities, not ideology.
Before I continue, allow me to correct myself. PBS did not author the fact check I linked you to. The author would make PBS look right wing . It was Politifact.
When the leftist propaganda you puke cannot pass POLITIFCAT'S rather prodigiously flimsy filters, you GOTTA be getting your claptrap from something as radically dishonest and far left as Mother Jones or even less trustworthy.
Why not divulge your source for those false claims? Embarrassed to claim it?
Do you disagree with this? I don't - and I am pro-choice down the line.maineman » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ From the moment of conception, every human being possesses inherent dignity
and worth,and our humanity does not depend on our age, stage of development,
race, or abilities.
This^ is CURRENT FEDERAL LAW. If instituted, not a word of this would change a thing the federal government does. It is purely rhetorical. in fact, there IS no "if." It IS instituted. It is current law, signed by WILLIAM JEFFERSON MILHOUSE CLINTON. Google, "Hyde Amendment."maineman » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑The Secretary must ensure that all HHS programs and activities
are rooted in a deep respect for innocent human life from day one until natural
death: Abortion and euthanasia are not health care.
What word of thismaineman » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ A robust respect for the sacred rights of conscience, both at HHS and among gov-
ernments and institutions funded by it, increases choices for patients and program
beneficiaries and furthers pluralism and tolerance. The Secretary must protect
Americans’ civil rights by ensuring that HHS programs and activities follow the
letter and spirit of religious freedom and conscience-protection laws.
a. do you disagree with?
b. do you find threatening?
c. accomplishes any of the **** you claimed?
Explain to the board what part of this hasty, ill-chosen copy paste you disagree with - please.maineman » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Radical actors inside and outside government are promoting harmful identity
politics that replaces biological sex with subjective notions of “gender identity” and
bases a person’s worth on his or her race, sex, or other identities. This destructive
dogma, under the guise of “equity,” threatens American’s fundamental liberties as
well as the health and well-being of children and adults alike. The next Secretary
must ensure that HHS programs protect children’s minds and bodies and that
HHS programs respect parents’ basic right to direct the upbringing, education,
and care of their children.
Explain how ANYTHING you presented does ANYTHING LIKE what you first claimed Project 2025, if "shoved down our throats," would accomplish.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?