User avatar
Deezer Shoove
Today 6:15 am
User avatar
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
10,300 posts
LowIQTrash » Today, 1:38 am » wrote: Shoe-in candidate. Destined to lose.

You can tell because Hillary was (genuinely) angry/upset at her loss, while Kamala displays zero emotion whatsoever. Her handlers already told her the outcome. This has been one of the most uneventful elections I have ever witnessed.

No different than Dukakis, Bob Dole, etc.

Now that I think about it, there may even be a possibility that the vast majority of the elections since (((1913))) had a pre-determined outcome. Whether the candidates themselves know is up for debate.

I would wager Reagan, Clinton, and Obama were all "in" on the details.

Bush Jr is an idiot but Cheney et al filled him in. Dubya was just there as your "easy to get along cowboy from Texas" figurehead.

--------------------------------------------------

What this means is we can expect another Democratic "insurgent"/popular candidate like FDR in the 2030s, right on mark for Great Depression 2.

But be warned, it was traditionally Democrats (Wilson, FDR, Truman, Johnson) who took us into bloody wars. Bush Jr doesn't even hold a candle to these 4.

2030s = upheaval and chaos, the likes of which not seen since the 1930s and 40s
Like stand-up comedians, women can't seem to connect when giving speeches as well as men.

She was glad she lost. The crocodile tears type "concession speech" rang so hollow.
Now she can do a Mike Pence and get the **** out of the public eye. Go back under the desk...
 
Please seat yourself.

Image

I like the very things you hate.
Updated 4 minutes ago
© 2012-2024 Liberal Forum