DeezerShoove » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Sorry, but I'm not sure which thing I agreed to poison pill-wise. Need a reminder.
A Trump win can make some difference vs Harris pabulum-policy.
World leaders see a change worthy of a fresh approach.
If they see a difference, then there's a difference. What I think matters not.
I read a lot of posts doing spell checks and stuff. So, I get lost in the miasma.
I suggested the Dems threw the election deliberately by nominating a weak candidate (about 1 mo before the election) so Trump gets in, and you said that was very plausible
The Democrats foresee terrible events down the line, within the next 4 yrs (likely 2), and they would rather not take the blame
Here’s another subtle detail:
Kamala doesn’t seem fazed by her loss either, unlike Hillary who threw a tantrum. The Democratic leadership (not the rank and file sheeple or media personalities) are so far eerily “accommodating”
If something looks too good to be true…
(The script is already written, it just needs time to play out sort of thing)
We shall revisit this in due time…and I’ll be waiting for some greenies from you